Groq vs Moonshot Kimi API
LLM API Providers pricing comparison · 2026
Groq uses custom pricing, while Moonshot Kimi API ranges from $0.15–$10/per million tokens. These products use different pricing models (Usage-based (pay per token/image/minute) vs Per-seat subscription), so a direct price comparison isn't meaningful — costs depend on usage volume and mix.
Sources & confidence
Every dollar amount and contract clause below traces back to a sourced fact. We don't manufacture composite scores.
Plans at a glance
Every tier per product. Lock one to drive the cost row above and reveal a tier-specific outbound CTA.
Contract terms
The fine print, surfaced. Green = buyer-friendly. Each clause backed by a quoted source.
What users say
Aggregated, with sample sizes. We use whichever review platform has data.
Groq and Moonshot Kimi API are two leading LLM API providers. This page compares their per-token pricing, available models, and tier structure so you can pick the right backend for your workload — whether you're optimizing for cost per 1M tokens, latency, or model quality.
Plan-by-Plan Pricing
| Plan | Groq | Moonshot Kimi API |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free /month | Custom |
| Developer | Custom | Custom |
| Enterprise | Custom | — |
Contract Terms
| Term | Groq | Moonshot Kimi API |
|---|---|---|
| Auto-renewal | No | Yes |
| Cancellation | — | No explicit cancellation window specified for API services beyond the effect of cancellation at the end of the current billing period for subscriptions. |
| Minimum commitment | — | $1 minimum recharge to activate API access. |
| Price escalation | No published price escalation schedule; token prices have generally trended downward as model catalog expands | — |
| Can downgrade | Yes | — |