Ironclad vs Harvey AI
AI Legal Tools pricing comparison · 2026
Ironclad uses custom pricing, while Harvey AI uses custom pricing. These products use different pricing models ( vs Per-seat subscription), so a direct price comparison isn't meaningful — costs depend on usage volume and mix.
Sources & confidence
Every dollar amount and contract clause below traces back to a sourced fact. We don't manufacture composite scores.
Plans at a glance
Every tier per product. Lock one to drive the cost row above and reveal a tier-specific outbound CTA.
Contract terms
The fine print, surfaced. Green = buyer-friendly. Each clause backed by a quoted source.
What users say
Aggregated, with sample sizes. We use whichever review platform has data.
Ironclad and Harvey AI both operate in the ai legal tools category. This page compares their list pricing.
Plan-by-Plan Pricing
| Plan | Ironclad | Harvey AI |
|---|---|---|
| Small/Mid-market | Custom | Custom |
| Mid-market/Enterprise | Custom | — |
| Large Enterprise | Custom | — |
Market Intelligence
Ironclad
- Median annual cost
- $38,825
- Average negotiated discount
- 21%
- Based on
- 328 deals
Harvey AI
- Median annual cost
- $175,000
- Based on
- 4 deals
Contract Terms
| Term | Ironclad | Harvey AI |
|---|---|---|
| Auto-renewal | Yes | Yes |
| Cancellation | — | Either party may terminate if the other fails to cure a material breach within 30 days. |
| Minimum commitment | 1 year | Harvey AI typically requires a minimum of 20 to 50 lawyer seats, with multi-year commitments (2 to 3 years) being common. |
| Price escalation | 5-9% annual uplift standard on renewals. 8% uplift language is commonly included in contracts. | 10% to 25% annually |
| Can downgrade | Yes | — |