Linear vs Asana
pricing comparison · 2026 · Updated April 2026
Linear pricing ranges from $0–$16/user/month, while Asana ranges from $0–$30.49/user/month. Linear is typically 44% more affordable, though your actual cost depends on tier and team size.
Sources & confidence
Every dollar amount and contract clause below traces back to a sourced fact. We don't manufacture composite scores.
Plans at a glance
Every tier per product. Lock one to drive the cost row above and reveal a tier-specific outbound CTA.
Contract terms
The fine print, surfaced. Green = buyer-friendly. Each clause backed by a quoted source.
What users say
Aggregated, with sample sizes. We use whichever review platform has data.
Linear and Asana serve overlapping but distinct audiences. Linear is a purpose-built issue tracker for software teams — fast, keyboard-first, and opinionated about engineering workflows. Asana is a general project management tool that engineering teams sometimes use alongside their primary issue tracker.
Linear's $10/user Basic plan is cheaper than Asana's $13.49/user Starter, and for pure engineering work, Linear's speed and GitHub integration are hard to beat. The comparison matters for dev teams asking: should we use Linear for everything, or Linear + Asana for cross-team coordination?
Plan-by-Plan Pricing
| Plan | Linear | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Free /month | Free /user/month |
| Basic | $10 /user/month | $13.49 /user/month |
| Business | $16 /user/month | $30.49 /user/month |
| Enterprise | Custom | — |
Cost at Scale
Total cost of ownership — licenses, implementation, and hidden costs included.
Linear
4 scenariosAsana
5 scenariosMarket Intelligence
Linear
- Median annual cost
- $700
- Based on
- 368 deals
Asana
- Median annual cost
- $366
- Average negotiated discount
- 22%
Contract Terms
| Term | Linear | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Auto-renewal | Yes | — |
| Cancellation | Cancel anytime for monthly plans; annual plans commit for the full year with no mid-term refunds | — |
| Minimum commitment | Annual billing required on all paid plans | — |
| Price escalation | No published annual uplift schedule; pricing has remained stable since launch | Users report features being shifted to higher Enterprise plan tiers after purchase, effectively increasing the cost required to maintain the same functionality mid-contract. |
| Can downgrade | Yes | — |
Continue researching
Our Verdict
Linear wins for engineering teams wanting a fast, opinionated issue tracker tightly integrated with their development workflow. If your team's primary work is writing code and shipping features, Linear's speed and GitHub integration are unmatched.
Asana wins when engineering is one of several teams that need to coordinate work. If product, design, and marketing all use Asana, keeping engineering there too reduces friction — even if Linear's UX is technically superior for code-focused work.
Frequently Asked Questions
01 Can Linear replace Asana entirely?
For engineering teams, yes. For cross-functional teams including marketing, HR, and legal, Asana's broader accessibility makes it the better company-wide choice.
02 Which is better for remote engineering teams?
Linear. Its async-first design, fast search, and deep Git integrations make it ideal for distributed teams working across time zones.
03 Is Linear's free plan comparable to Asana's?
Both are functional for small teams. Linear free has no user cap but limits cycle history. Asana free caps at 15 users but includes more view types.
04 Do companies use both Linear and Asana?
Yes, this is common. Engineering uses Linear; product, design, and marketing use Asana. Cross-team dependencies require manual syncing or automation via Zapier/Make.