Milvus vs Qdrant: Pricing & Features Compared 2026
Compare / Milvus vs Qdrant
Shortlist
Team size
25 seats

Milvus vs Qdrant

Vector Databases pricing comparison · 2026 · Updated April 2026

Milvus pricing ranges from $0–$155/month, while Qdrant ranges from $0–$0/month. Qdrant is typically 100% more affordable, though your actual cost depends on tier and team size.

Visit
See pricing on each vendor's site
Above-the-fold path — each link opens the vendor's pricing page in a new tab.
Compare
2 products · Vector Databases
Side-by-side · live
Milvus
Milvus is an open-source, cloud-native vector database built for scalable AI applications,
verified 27d ago
$369 $450
View pricing →
Qdrant
Qdrant is an open-source vector database with a free managed cloud tier and usage-based pa
verified 27d ago
$369 $450
View pricing →
Verdict · Vendr median · year 1
Qdrant saves $81 vs Milvus · 25 seats
Cheapest $369
Spread 18%
Estimated license cost
at 25 seats
List price × seats. Click a tier below to lock it.
Zilliz Cloud Enterprise
$47K/yr
year 1 license · $155/seat
Pricing model unknown
Pricing model unknown
no public list price found
What buyers actually pay
median, annual
Vendr deal-flow data. The real benchmark, not list price.
Median annual
$450/yr
Vendr · n=8 · limited data
↓ Lowest median
Median annual
$369/yr
Vendr · n=3 · limited data
REF · 01

Sources & confidence

Every dollar amount and contract clause below traces back to a sourced fact. We don't manufacture composite scores.

Where this data comes from
Vendr · TrustRadius · Reddit · BBB · official docs
Sources 6 sourced facts
5 hidden-cost · Vendr median
Last verified 3w ago
Confidence Medium confidence
Sources 1 sourced fact
Vendr median
Last verified 3w ago
Confidence Medium confidence
REF · 02

Plans at a glance

Every tier per product. Lock one to drive the cost row above and reveal a tier-specific outbound CTA.

Tier ladder
Click a tier to lock the cost row to it. Locking surfaces a tier-specific Visit CTA.
REF · 03

Hidden costs

Each cost is severity-ranked, with the dollar range quoted from its source (Vendr, Reddit, TrustRadius, BBB, official docs) — never our estimate.

Beyond the sticker
Severity-ranked, sourced
3 documented
  • Self-Hosting Infrastructure Costs
    $50-$400/month
    2 sources
  • Opaque vCU Pricing Makes Cost Forecasting Difficult
    $99-$1,800/month
    2 sources
  • Extreme Scale Costs on Zilliz Cloud
    $23,000/month
    1 source
No hidden costs documented
REF · 05

What users say

Aggregated, with sample sizes. We use whichever review platform has data.

User reviews
TrustRadius · Trustpilot · G2
No public ratings yet
Best for
Teams with DevOps capacity who want full control and no cloud costs
Watch out
vCU pricing model is opaque and difficult to estimate costs before running actual workloads
No public ratings yet
Best for
Testing and prototypes
Decide
Get a quote from each vendor
Each link opens the vendor's pricing page in a new tab.
License cost is computed from publicly listed plans (real math, list price × seats). Median annual cost is from Vendr's deal flow when available — see source badges. Hidden costs and contract terms each cite their own sources. We do not invent composite scores.
Vector Databases

Milvus

$0–$155
/month
5 plans · Free tier
Full pricing breakdown →
VS
Vector Databases

Qdrant

$0–$0
/month
4 plans · Free tier
Full pricing breakdown →

Milvus and Qdrant are both open-source vector databases with strong self-hosted communities and managed cloud options, but they differ meaningfully in architecture, feature scope, and target audience. Milvus, originally built at Zilliz and donated to LF AI & Data, is designed for enterprise-scale vector search with support for billions of vectors, distributed deployments, and a rich ecosystem of index types (IVF, HNSW, DiskANN, etc.). Qdrant is a newer, Rust-based vector database focused on performance, payload filtering, and developer ergonomics.

Milvus is the more feature-complete option for large-scale deployments — it supports multiple vector fields per collection, scalar filtering, time-travel (data versioning), and a mature Python/Go/Java SDK ecosystem. However, this power comes with operational complexity; Milvus requires Kubernetes or Docker Compose with multiple dependent services (etcd, MinIO, Pulsar). Qdrant, by contrast, ships as a single binary with no external dependencies, making it far easier to operate.

On pricing, both are free as open-source projects. Qdrant Cloud starts free and remains open-source with no paid tier requirements for self-hosted use. Milvus's managed cloud (Zilliz Cloud) starts free but scales to $1,000/mo or more for larger clusters, reflecting its enterprise focus.

Plan-by-Plan Pricing

Plan Milvus Qdrant
Open Source (Self-Hosted) Free /month Free /month
Zilliz Cloud Free Free /month Custom
Zilliz Cloud Standard $99 /month Custom
Zilliz Cloud Enterprise $155 /month Custom
Zilliz Cloud Business Critical Custom

Market Intelligence

Milvus

Median annual cost
$450
Based on
8 deals

Qdrant

Median annual cost
$369
Based on
3 deals

Continue researching

Our Verdict

Choose Milvus if you're building a large-scale, enterprise AI application that needs to handle billions of vectors, requires advanced index types, or needs multi-vector-field support and data versioning. It's best for teams with DevOps capacity to manage a distributed system or those using Zilliz Cloud for managed hosting.

Choose Qdrant if you want a high-performance, easy-to-operate vector database with excellent payload filtering and a modern Rust-based architecture. It's ideal for teams that prioritize operational simplicity, fast query performance, and a self-hosted deployment that runs as a single binary.

Frequently Asked Questions

01 Is Qdrant free compared to Milvus?

Both Milvus and Qdrant are fully open-source and free to self-host. Qdrant Cloud (managed) starts free with a generous free tier. Milvus's managed cloud (Zilliz Cloud) also has a free tier but paid tiers scale up to $1,000/mo or more for large clusters. For self-hosted deployments, both have zero licensing cost.

02 Which is easier to deploy and operate?

Qdrant is significantly easier to operate. It ships as a single Rust binary with no external service dependencies, making it trivial to run in Docker or on a bare server. Milvus requires orchestrating multiple components (etcd, MinIO, and optionally Pulsar/Kafka) which adds meaningful operational overhead, especially without Kubernetes expertise.

03 Can Qdrant handle the same scale as Milvus?

For most workloads (up to hundreds of millions of vectors), Qdrant performs excellently and is competitive with Milvus. However, Milvus is specifically engineered for billion-scale deployments with distributed sharding, making it the better choice for the very largest AI applications. Teams expecting billion-vector scale from day one should evaluate Milvus or Zilliz Cloud.