Greenhouse vs Ashby
AI Recruiting pricing comparison · 2026 · Updated April 2026
Greenhouse pricing ranges from $10627–$75900/year, while Ashby ranges from $400–$400/month. Ashby is typically 99% more affordable, though your actual cost depends on tier and team size.
Sources & confidence
Every dollar amount and contract clause below traces back to a sourced fact. We don't manufacture composite scores.
Plans at a glance
Every tier per product. Lock one to drive the cost row above and reveal a tier-specific outbound CTA.
What users say
Aggregated, with sample sizes. We use whichever review platform has data.
Greenhouse and Ashby represent two different generations of applicant tracking systems: Greenhouse is the established enterprise ATS used by 7,000+ companies with deep integrations and structured hiring frameworks, while Ashby is the modern challenger built for fast-growing startups with a focus on speed, built-in analytics, and flexible month-to-month contracts. Greenhouse starts at $6,000-$10,000/year with mandatory annual contracts, while Ashby offers a free plan for startups under 10 employees and Growth plans starting at $300-$400/month with month-to-month flexibility -- making this a comparison between enterprise maturity and modern agility.
Plan-by-Plan Pricing
| Plan | Greenhouse | Ashby |
|---|---|---|
| Core | Custom | $400 /month |
| Plus | Custom | Custom |
| Pro | Custom | Custom |
Cost at Scale
Total cost of ownership — licenses, implementation, and hidden costs included.
Greenhouse
3 scenariosAshby
3 scenariosMarket Intelligence
Greenhouse
- Median annual cost
- $27,000
- Average negotiated discount
- 16%
- Based on
- 711 deals
Ashby
- Median annual cost
- $695
- Based on
- 24 deals
Continue researching
Our Verdict
Choose Greenhouse if you are an established company with 200+ employees that needs enterprise-grade integrations, structured interview frameworks, a proven track record, and a dedicated onboarding module. Greenhouse's extensive app marketplace, 7,000+ customer base, and deep HRIS integrations make it the safer choice for enterprises requiring compliance, diversity analytics, and a large ecosystem of recruiting tools.
Choose Ashby if you are a startup or scale-up under 500 employees that values modern UI, fast performance, built-in analytics dashboards, and contract flexibility. Ashby's free plan for teams under 10 employees and month-to-month Growth plans ($400/month) offer dramatically lower commitment than Greenhouse's $6,000+ annual minimums -- and its analytics-first design often eliminates the need for add-on reporting tools that Greenhouse charges extra for.
Frequently Asked Questions
01 How much cheaper is Ashby than Greenhouse for a 50-person startup?
Significantly cheaper. A 50-person startup would pay $400-$500/month ($4,800-$6,000/year) for Ashby Growth, versus $6,000-$8,000/year for Greenhouse Essential plus $5,000 in implementation fees ($11,000-$13,000 first year). Ashby also offers month-to-month contracts with no implementation fees, while Greenhouse requires annual commitments and charges $5,000+ for onboarding.
02 Does Ashby have the same integrations as Greenhouse?
No. Greenhouse has a significantly larger integration ecosystem with 500+ pre-built integrations and an app marketplace, including deep connections to major HRIS platforms (Workday, BambooHR, ADP), background check providers, and assessment tools. Ashby's integration library is growing but smaller, focused on modern tools like Slack, Rippling, and BambooHR. Enterprises with complex multi-tool stacks may find Greenhouse's ecosystem more mature.
03 Can Ashby scale to enterprise size like Greenhouse?
Ashby is scaling rapidly and now serves companies with 500+ employees on its Enterprise plan, offering SSO, SAML, SCIM, dedicated CSMs, and custom SLAs. However, Greenhouse has a longer track record at enterprise scale with 7,000+ customers including Airbnb, HubSpot, and DoorDash. For companies over 1,000 employees, Greenhouse's proven enterprise infrastructure may still be the safer choice.